So, I talked in a previous post about broadcasting my ideas to different sources, and how that has affected my thought process.
Specifically, I sent my idea about the Bible being taught as literature to teachers and professors that I knew would oppose my idea. Here is the response of one teacher who replied as I had hoped/expected:
I loved her response. Very honest and thorough. She has persuaded me to perhaps switch to a definition claim. Or cause/effect. A different claim that will argue the Bible to be more than just a religious text--that it could be as widely taught as Shakespeare or the classics, but not try to impose it upon teachers of public schools.
I'd love your insight/help on which would be most effective.